EFCC explains delay in action against Blessing CEO, citing lack of formal petition despite public pressure over cancer fundraising claims

In Abuja, Nigeria, on Tuesday, April 7, 2026, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission has clarified why it has not taken action against relationship expert Blessing CEO over her controversial cancer claims and public fundraising.

Also read: EFCC arrests suspect over ₦993m forex fraud in Ilorin

The anti-graft agency stated that it has yet to receive any formal petition regarding the matter, a key requirement before initiating an investigation or pursuing legal action.

Blessing CEO had last month announced that she had been diagnosed with stage four breast cancer, prompting an emotional appeal for financial support from Nigerians.

The claim triggered widespread sympathy and donations.

However, the media personality later revised her position in interviews, stating that she had not been diagnosed with stage four cancer.

She attributed the earlier claims to a misunderstanding and explained that she was still undergoing medical evaluation and had not commenced chemotherapy.

She also addressed circulating figures about donations, maintaining that she received ₦13 million rather than the widely reported ₦100 million.

The development sparked intense public backlash, with many social media users calling on the EFCC to intervene and investigate the circumstances surrounding the fundraising.

Responding to the growing pressure, an EFCC official told TheCable that the commission cannot act solely on online outrage without a credible complainant.

The official emphasised that a formal petition is essential not only to authorise an investigation but also to provide a foundation for any potential court proceedings.

Without a petitioner, the agency noted, it would lack a witness to substantiate claims if the matter proceeds to trial.

The EFCC further urged individuals who may have made donations or possess verifiable evidence to come forward, describing such input as critical to determining whether any offence, including obtaining money under false pretence, had occurred.

Also read: EFCC faces delay in CBEX funds recovery probe

The commission’s explanation highlights the procedural constraints guiding its operations, even amid mounting public scrutiny and calls for swift accountability.